|
Michael
D. Robbins
Socrates—Greek
Philosopher, Teacher of Plato: May 20, 467 BC, birth place
unknown, but proposed as Athens. There is insufficient data given
to do anything but cast a chart for around noon. (Source: Maurice
Wemyss who references the ancient records that Socrates was born on
the 6th Thargelion in the 4th year of the 77th Olympiad—according
to Stanley's History of Philosophy, equated with May 20, 467
BC O.S.). Using approximately that time, the Ascendant could be either
late Leo or early Virgo; MC, either Taurus or Gemini; Sun conjunct
Jupiter in Taurus with both near the MC; Venus, retrograde, conjunct
Mercury in Gemini; Mars in Aries; Saturn in Leo; Uranus in Virgo rising
close to Ascendant; Neptune in Capricorn; Pluto in Scorpio near the
IC).

There
are good reasons for thinking that either a Leo or Virgo Ascendant
is justified. If Virgo, however, it is unlikely that the birth
would be any later the 12:33 PM, LMT, due to the manner of Socrates’
historically renowned death—he was made to drink the poison, Hemlock,
which would fit well with Pisces (ruled by drug-related Neptune and
deadly Pluto—the orthodox Jupiter rulership of Pisces, with Jupiter
on or near the MC relating to the fact that his is one of the most
significant and inspiring deaths in all history). On the other hand,
and improbably, the Aries eighth house cusp would relate to a sudden,
violent death—especially since Mars in natally placed in Aries—a death
very unrelated to death by relatively painless poison.. It is also
unlikely that the birth occurred before 11:50 AM, LMT, as this would
remove the Sun from the ninth house of philosophy, and emphasize instead
a more public career or office. Socrates is thought by many to have
neglected his civic duties, since, though qualified, he never sought
public office, and, instead, used every occasion to discuss issues
of philosophy whenever and wherever his fellow citizens congregated..
Socrates was one of the greatest of all philosophers and a modern
man in many respects. He could be regarded as the ‘Father of Western
Philosophy’, and was, according to Plato in his Apology, pronounced
by the Oracle of Delphi to be the wisest man in all Greece, even before
his fortieth year.
The “Acute Energy of Divine Mental Perception”, the energy of the
third ray, was fully manifest through Socrates, as was the power
to illumine conferred by Taurus. As well, because he was a great
teacher to many (and especially to Plato, found according to the Tibetan
upon the second ray) and a lover of wisdom (which is what the word
“philosophy”—philo sophia—means) his relation to the second
ray of Love-Wisdom (and especially to wisdom) is more than
reasonable.
“Such Avatars were
Plato, the first Patanjali and Sankaracharya; they emerge upon the
second ray line of energy, in the department of the Christ and are
expressions of hierarchical force.” (EXH 298)
As Socrates was a major “light bearer” intimately related to the world
of “ideas” or “forms” (as Plato called his archetypes), his major
rays may be presumed to be similar to those of Plato—namely the second
and the third.
Because his philosophical method was critical, sharp, logical, syllogistic
and endlessly inquisitive, there is evidence for the presence of the
fifth ray in the mind, but Mercury in oscillatory Gemini would surely
provide ample fourth ray facility—he was always in discussion and
dialogue. His mind was unclouded by emotion (as his serene and noble
behavior through his death process clearly indicates). This may speak
of the second ray in the emotional nature. Perhaps not much can be
said of his physical nature (other than to cite his proverbial ‘ugliness’
or crudeness of form, and to infer that he was physically strong,
as stories of his courage in war suggest). He did not seem to be a
person of regular habits (seven ray, in the physical nature) but rather
a peripatetic—always walking and talking his great love, philosophy.
This seems more related to the third ray in the outer, physical-etheric
nature.
Socrates’ major precept was “know thyself”. This illuminating
dictum has resounded resonantly down the ages as the keynote of Socratic
philosophy. All students of esoteric astrology recognize the relation
of this injunction to the sign, Leo, the sign of self-knowledge.
It is no wonder that the Oracle of Delphi considered him the wisest
of men, for “know thyself” was the keynote of the Oracle as well.
Socrates (though some dispute his actual physical existence, just
as some dispute the actuality of Jesus) was a great light,
and yet a humble person. In all humility (not just a Virgoan trait,
but one achieved by the advanced Leo individual) he wondered in puzzlement
why the Oracle had declared him the wisest, but then concluded (a
little humorously yet aptly) that, while others professed knowledge
without realizing their ignorance, he at least was aware of his own
ignorance. The issues of pride and humility (especially, when the
third ray is involved—mental pride and humility) is pivotal
to the Leo experience of the initiate (and certainly Socrates was
an initiate of some degree, perhaps the third).
We must also remember the two keynotes of Leo—the “Will to Rule” and
the “Will to Illumine”. It is the latter to which Socrates, obviously,
related. Perhaps his connection to the first keynote manifested in
his determination to master or rule over ignorance. His position with
respect to ignorance was very much like that of the Buddha, Who considered
ignorance the greatest sin. For Socrates, virtue and knowledge were
identical; thus, no person (who knew better) would willingly
do the wrong. Is this an optimistic second ray attitude, finding,
through overestimation, too much “good” in human nature? According
to the Tibetan, the second ray type often has this attitude towards
“loved ones”. Socrates held it for all human beings.
A few other characteristics point to the reasonableness of Leo as
an Ascendant. Socrates was, reputedly, a man of great physical courage,
who fought nobly and powerfully in war. With a late Leo Ascendant,
the zodiacal decanate ruler would be Aries, with its ruler Mars already
placed in courageous Aries; Mars would trine a late Leo Ascendant.
(Of course, Jupiter as the ruler of the third decanate of Leo—as proposed
by the Tibetan—would contribute to the quality and scope of the illuminative
power which Socrates carried.)
As well, Socrates did more than just talk—although he did that
quite well, with his Mercury and Venus conjunction in Gemini. He lived
his convictions. There were probably ways in which he could have
avoided his death sentence for religious heresy (Uranus rising, Sun
in ninth house), and corrupting Athenian youth (Neptune in the fifth
house), but, instead, he accepted the judgment with great serenity,
humility and courage, and set an historically inspiring example
of the philosophical and
noble death. To the author’s judgment, this
relates more to the sign Leo (the sign of “coeur-age”) than
to Virgo (though, significantly, the veiled hierarchical ruler of
Leo, Uranus, is placed in Virgo and is rising).
The sculpted images we have of Socrates also suggest the more hearty
and vigorous Leo rather than the Virgo of slighter frame. As well,
were Virgo the Ascendant, the ruling planet, Mercury, for which sign
placement is so physiognomically and physically revealing when one
of the Mercurial signs (Gemini or Virgo) is the Sun or Ascendant,
would be placed in Gemini (another sign giving height, slenderness
and spareness). The image of Socrates much more suggests his Taurus
Sun, which would be physiognomically accented were Leo (ruled by the
Sun) the Ascendant. Socrates’ reputed strength and fortitude in battle
also suggest Leo. The Moon would be in Cancer in any case, and is
surely reflected physiognomically in the images of him which claim
to represent him.
One other interesting matter is of moment. Socrates would, legend
tells, suddenly become wrapped in deep communion with his “Daimon”—his
“Inner Genius” or “Inner God”. He is reputed to have stood still for
three whole days in deep meditative process with this “god”,
whom esotericists will recognize as the soul or Solar Angel. Apart
from the tremendous fortitude and fixity (Leo and Taurus) required
for such a physical feat (if the story is true, he certainly did not
observe seventh ray rhythms), the “Daimon”, or Solar Angel, is directly
connected with the solar sign, Leo. This Solar Angel is a far higher
form of identity than the customary ego or personality, and
Socrates, so it seems, was deeply impressed by the need to understand
the scope and nature of identity.
Virgo, as an Ascendant, is not without its justifications. The keen
mental discrimination of Virgo would be strongly in evidence, along
with the Virgoan traits of modesty, piety and humility, and
critique (he was the “gad-fly”—often more than unappreciated—to Athenian
society). Socrates was, we know, deeply interested in ethics—a
sometime Virgo preoccupation. With a Virgo Ascendant, his Mercurial
characteristics (already very powerful through the Mercury/Venus conjunction
in Mercurial Gemini) would be even more strongly accented.
We must ask whether the Venus/Mercury conjunction (both orthodox and
esoteric ruler of Gemini in Gemini) plus a strong fifth ray,
would be sufficient to give him his critical (and ironic) method of
inquiry. Very possibly. Mental, revolutionary Uranus (veiled hierarchical
ruler of Leo) also cannot be ignored in Socrates’ case, as he may
well have been an illumined initiate of the third degree; certainly
his survival as a great philosophical influence warrants that he was
no ordinary individual, and possessed an encompassing mountain-top
perspective (though he surely would have denied it). In a way,
Socrates was responsible for a philosophical revolution (at
least in terms of technique—Virgo). He emphasized the method
of the “dialectic” a logical method which consisted in examining statements
by pursuing their implications, on the assumption that if a statement
were true it could not lead to false consequences. This approach
was intellectually revolutionary for his time. Socrates’ contributions
to philosophy were a new method of approaching knowledge, a conception
of the soul as the seat both of normal waking consciousness and of
moral character, and a sense of the universe as purposively mind-ordered.
Interestingly, Einstein, another mental revolutionary,
had a prominent Uranus in Virgo.
Tradition has it that Socrates not only neglected his civic and social
‘duties” (though not his military duties—Mars in Aries) in
favor of philosophical discussion, but his home duties as well. His
wife, Xanthippe, has become legendary as a shrew. Perhaps it is no
easy thing to be married to a philosopher! One wonders if, with a
Virgo Ascendant, Socrates might have paid a bit more attention to
his domestic responsibilities (he already had the Moon in Cancer,
tying him, at least unconsciously, to the “Mother Force”). Rather,
it would seem, he exemplified a Leo Ascendant (following his individual
and deeper soul calling, ignoring the more mundane considerations
to which Virgo would have related him). If this interpretation has
merit, his Virgoan expression related more to innovations (Uranus)
of new philosophical techniques (Virgo) and these he carefully cultivated
(Virgo).
The power for philosophy of a conjunction between the radiant Sun
and philosophical, second-ray Jupiter in luminous Taurus, with the
Sun in the house of higher mind (the ninth) and Jupiter just into
the tenth (reputation and vocation) speaks for itself. Socrates’ mind
was ever dwelling upon the ;great thoughts, though his Geminian
intellect (fourth ray Mercury and fifth ray Venus, retrograde, in
second ray Gemini) gave him the versatility and adaptability to be
intellectually sharp on the level of concrete mind as well. Dedicated
Vesta, conjunct first Venus and then, by translation of light, Mercury,
adds great focus to the intellectual, Geminian preoccupation. The
Sun and Jupiter (both of them on the second ray) are (using this approximate
chart) either conjunct or very close to the MC. Thus the light
which Socrates’ stimulated has already lasted nearly 2500 years. The
MC in Taurus seems correct, rather than in more versatile, mobile,
Gemini, for Socrates, like the Taurean Buddha, was a great light-bearer
and light-bestower.
A few declinations are interesting and important. Venus and Mercury
(already powerful by longitudinal conjunction) are closely parallel
in the same degree of declination, adding to Socrates’ versatile,
mental brilliance. Saturn and Moon, only very widely conjunct by longitude,
are parallel within twenty minutes of arc by declination, giving him
his ‘home karma’ (his challenges and domestic sorrows, even
as he shone brilliantly among his philosophical colleagues and the
social elite), and also, the later rejection by the state of Athens
(Saturn representing the law and the Moon, one’s community). Socrates’
intellectually nonconformist nature is accented by the close parallel
between revolutionary Uranus, assertive Mars and ingenious Pallas
Athene; clearly, he went his own way and broke through traditional
boundaries of thought (Mars/Uranus), even in that relatively free-minded
society.
A few stars tell a supportive story. Mars (battles and initiatives
in the ninth house of philosophy—part of the “gadfly” character theme)
is parallel one of the stars in the constellation Aries—Hamal, which
means, “to go one’s own way”. Mars is also conjunct Mirfak which is
interpreted as “challenge-oriented”. With an Ascendant in the last
degree of Leo, both Betelgeuse (“uninterrupted success”) and Polaris
(the power to “show the way” or direct) would, significantly, be on
the MC.
The position of Pluto cannot be ignored as a the planet of death (and
esoteric ruler of the house of death—the eighth, placed, as well,
in Scorpio, the sign of death). Pluto is positioned in the house
of the home or “city state” (Athens), quite closely conjuncted to
the IC. Exoterically, Pluto may have contributed to his unhappy home
life; perhaps he was thrown out of the house (exiled) more than once.
He was also rejected and, even, killed by those in authority in Athens.
The charges against him were unfair, politically motivated, of murky
origin and surrounded by obscurity. Clearly, under-handed, ‘subterranean’
forces were at work, and the result was the imposed yet sacrificial
death of a great exponent of the Light. Pluto is, characteristically
(and significantly), the planet of poison. As well, from an
esoteric perspective, the death was a service to the Ashram (fourth
house), and served as a model of exemplary, philosophical serenity
for two millennia and more. This Pluto (darkness) opposes the brilliant,
revelatory, Sun/Jupiter conjunction. This can easily be seen
as the inevitable opposition of darkness to the Light of Wisdom. Interestingly,
the star, Diadem (“to sacrifice oneself”), is conjunct the rising
Uranus, which, itself, is closely parallel to Hamal (again—“to go
one’s own way”).
Socrates became convinced that his calling was to search for wisdom
(Leo, Taurus, and the second ray) concerning right conduct (Earth
signs) by which he might guide the intellectual and moral improvement
of the Athenians (transformative Uranus in improvement-oriented Virgo).
He made many enemies in the process (unforgiving Saturn in Leo, the
sign of pride, in the twelfth house of “hidden enemies”). Their conspiracy
against his person, only fanned the flames of the great philosophical
quest. We might say that Socrates was a martyr for the spirit of philosophy,
though there was in his martyrdom none of the fanatical sixth ray.
As a synthetic thinker, Socrates displayed the union of the second
and third rays, as did Plato. Perhaps the monad was upon the third,
the soul upon the second and the personality upon the third. According
to the Tibetan,
“Plato endeavoured
to picture forth the completeness of the Whole and the intricacy of
the ideas which have come forth as an expression of that Whole.”
(EP II 399)
Here we have an example of entirety (second ray) and intricacy
(third ray). It is likely that Plato gathered much of his original
inspiration from Socrates, who, reasonably, shared the same soul and
monadic rays, but with very different personality equipment.
Constellationally,
the third ray would have its entry points into the chart through the
Cancerian Moon and the Capricornian Neptune. As well, the conjunction
of sometime third ray Mercury and luminous Venus in the third sign,
Gemini, gives another important conduit for this acutely mental force.
The second ray also can enter through the Gemini conjunction, as Gemini
(during this world period) is primarily a second ray sign, and Venus
(orthodox ruler of his Taurus Sun) has a strong second ray component.
The conjunction between the second ray Sun and second ray Jupiter
in the second sign, Taurus, gives a potent entry point for
the ray of Love-Wisdom—especially, wisdom. Through this conjunction
the “Greatest Light” associated with the second ray is accessible.
Neptune would be an esoteric veiled esoteric ruler whether the Ascendant
were Leo or Virgo. It is an intuitive planet (with much second and
sixth ray) and it is placed in the Leo house (the fifth) in either
case. Esoterically, this has to do with inspired creative expression
drawing from the realm of accumulated quality—the casual body. What
this position says about Socrates’ children (if he had any) or his
early artistic life (apparently he practiced the art of his father,
Sophroniscus, who was a sculptor) we cannot say. Buddhic Neptune was
trine the atmic/manasic planet, Uranus, showing a balance between
these factors within the Spiritual Triad. Socrates’ communion with
his “Daimon” might also be, in part, reflected here, as Neptune gives
impressionability in a field or house (the fifth) where the Solar
Angel is strong.
First ray factors are also to be acknowledged, with sometime first
ray Uranus rising, and first ray Pluto, angular. If Leo is hypothesized
as the Ascendant, then all first ray signs are tenanted, with Mars
in Aries being very strong. These factors would strengthen Socrates’
ability to stand on principle, and give his life for his philosophical
conviction.
The synthesis of Socrates’ principal third and second rays are reflected
in his doctrine of the central importance of the soul leading him
to the belief that all virtues converge into one, which is “the Good”,
or knowledge of one’s true self and purposes through the course of
a lifetime. Knowledge in turn depends on the nature or essence of
things as they really are, for the underlying “forms” or archetypes
of things are more real than their experienced exemplifications (clearly
a second ray perspective) This conception leads to a teleological
view of the world that all the forms participate in and lead to the
highest “form”—the “form” or archetype of “the Good”. Here we see
synthesized the “Greatest Light” and the Wisdom of the second ray
and Taurus, as well the brilliant unity-in-light of Leo—the
“light of the soul”. (EA 293, 329)
It is unlikely that we will every be entirely certain of the chart
of Socrates, or even, in every particular, of his rays, but enough
has been suggested to bring forward the major energy pattern of this
seminal, revolutionary thinker who, certainly in death, proved
himself to be a noble example of his highest thought.
Back
Martin Luther
Michael D. Robbins
Martin
Luther-Inspirer of the Protestant Reformation: November 10, 1483,
Eisleben, Germany, 11:00 PM. (Source: his mother; listed in More Notable
Nativities), died Feburary 18, 1546.
(Ascendant, Leo; Sun in Scorpio with Venus conjunct Saturn also in
Scorpio; Mars, as well, in Scorpio; Moon in Aries in or on cusp of
9th house {depending upon exact time used}; Mercury conjunct Neptune
in Sagittarius; Uranus also in Sagittarius; Jupiter in Libra)
Martin Luther was a great religious reformer, clearly changing the
course of Christianity in the 16th Century, and protesting against
many of the abuses then current in the Catholic Church. He became
a priest in 1507 and taught theology. As an act of protest in 1517,
he nailed his ninety-five Theses to the church door and in 1519 he
broke with the Catholic Church by refusing to recognize the supreme
power and infallibility of the Pope. He was condemned as a heretic
in 1525 and began the Reformed Church also in 1525; and also married
in that same year (a year in which transiting Jupiter was very active,
transiting both his Moon and reaching his Taurus MC). He spent the
rest of his life organizing and spreading the new gospel of his Protestant
Reformation.
The Tibetan associates Martin Luther with the first ray (at least
in terms of his writing style).
"The literary work of a first ray man will be strong and trenchant,
but he will care little for style or finish in his writings. Perhaps
examples of this type would be Luther, Carlyle, and Walt Whitman."
(EPI 202)
It is, however, difficult to know whether this means that Luther was
principally upon the first ray, or that perhaps his personality or
mind were upon the first ray. In any case, such was the nature and
strength of his effect upon humanity and religion that the first ray
must, necessarily, have been prominent. Was he as well in the department
of the Master Jesus and more essentially (in the soul) upon the sixth
ray? This question could be debated. The Christian Church is certainly
upon the sixth ray under the direction of the Master Jesus, and Luther's
most profound effect was at first upon the Christian Church, and,
inevitably, upon society (build around that Church). Yet, it must
be remembered that the Catholic Church itself, upon which his effect
was, to say least, shocking and provocative, is found upon the first
ray in its soul nature (its rays, according to the Tibetan, being
13-667).
St. Paul who conditioned the entire Scorpionic direction of Christianity,
was not, it would appear, a first ray soul-rather, probably, a sixth
ray soul with a fifth ray monadic subray. Paul's monadic ray, however,
was very probably the first (as he was one of those who would "take
the kingdom of heaven by storm"). Could this have been the case with
Luther as well? Intensive biographical research is needed.
Luther's early life in the church was both devoted and disciplined.
In 1505, when his progressed Sun in Sagittarius held a midway position
between (and conjuncting) both his natal and progressed Uranus (also
in Sagittarius), he had a profound religious experience and entered
a monastery of the Augustinian friars at Erfurt. He devoutly adhered
to the rigid disciplines of the order. Transiting Saturn had entered
his twelfth house (the monastery) and progressing Saturn (natally
in the sign of mortal conflict, Scorpio) continued to converge upon
the IC of his chart.
Luther was ordained as a priest in 1507 with Saturn in the vicinity
of and then crossing his Ascendant, indicating the serious beginning
of a new cycle. In 1510 he was sent to Rome on business for his order
and was shocked to witness the spiritual laxity apparent in high places.
His high idealism (Mercury conjunct Neptune in Sagittarius), further
intensified by his powerful Scorpio planets could not condone such
lapses. Thus, the sixth ray certainly cannot be dismissed from Luther's
chart. He was a man of great intensity-little given to compromise,
especially on matters of principle (first ray blended with the sixth).
His mind began to envision the possibility of reformation (Mercury
in Sagittarius, parallel Uranus.)
From the astrological perspective, the esoteric ruler of his Leo Ascendant
is sixth ray Neptune in sixth ray Sagittarius, and trining his singleton
Moon. Thus, there exists a powerful conduit into the chart for the
sixth ray. As his Sun sign is placed in Scorpio, both the orthodox
and esoteric rulers of this sign are sixth ray Mars-a planet further
empowered because it itself is placed in Scorpio-its own sign.
In many ways Luther exhibited some of the same psycho-spiritual dynamics
as St. Paul. The years between 1510 and 1513 were times of profound
spiritual and physical torment. Obsessed with anxieties about his
own salvation, he sought relief in frequent confession and extreme
asceticism (sixth ray). Here we see at work the full dynamics of Scorpio
(the sign of struggle between the soul and personality.) The presence
of the often tormented, harmony-seeking fourth ray (conveyed by Scorpio)
may be inferred, as well as by his own love of music and hymn-writing.
Scorpio is the sign of radical transformation, and he had not less
than four major astrological factors are placed in this sign-Mars
(the "God of War"), Saturn (the "God of Opportunity" and Discipline),
Venus (the 'Goddess of the Soul') and that all-important centralizer
of energy, the Sun. These planets are of the utmost importance in
the struggle between the great Pairs of Opposites-soul and personality.
Mars indicates the full rebellion of the integrated personality against
the higher principle, but also the courage to face the opponent; Saturn
("Lord of Materiality") concentrates the forces of the "Dweller on
the Threshold", but also gives the discipline and understanding of
law and principle necessary to oppose it; Venus indicates that the
light of the soul has penetrated to the dark places (Scorpio) within
the personality and is involved in its redemptive work, uplifting
towards the mountain top, where its transfiguring light can shine.
Interestingly, both Saturn and Venus are placed in the Venus-ruled
decanate of Scorpio-the second, and Mars is in its own decanate-the
first. The Sun is concentrated in the third decanate, considered by
some to be ruled by Pluto, indicating a final struggle, especially
with the mental heads of the Hydra (pride, separativeness and cruelty).
From a certain perspective, these four planets can be considered potently
involved in the second and third initiations. Scorpio is archetypally
the sign of the second initiation, and Luther, with his tremendous
early emphasis upon purity, idealism, devotion and principle, was
certainly at least that-an initiate of the second degree. Through
Mars the Hydra can be fought. Through Saturn the Dweller can be intelligently
faced. Through Venus, the astral waters can be calmed by the luminous
light of mind, and through both Venus and the Sun, the mind itself
can be greatly illuminated. Further, Saturn and Venus, conjuncted,
are the two rulers of Capricorn, the sign most associated with the
third degree. For those upon the "reversed wheel", Saturn rules the
first decanate of Capricorn, Venus the second, and Vulcan the third.
Interestingly the sequence in his chart is Saturn-Venus-Sun, and it
is well known from the Tibetan's writings, that "Vulcan and the Sun
are one". The Sun in the third decanate of Capricorn promises illumination
on the mountain top. Thus we see in this chart a passage through the
second degree and a rehearsal for the third degree through the agency
of those planets especially related to the third degree (Saturn, Venus
and the Sun).
An interesting sidelight on one of these planets (Venus) is related
to the fact that in his forty second year, he married a former nun
Kartharina von Bora (Venus in Scorpio), raised six children (Jupiter,
planet of increase, is ruler of the fifth house of children, placed
in Libra, the sign of marriage, and also conjuncted to Juno-the asteroid
of unions-itself placed in Libra), and had a happy (Venus) home life
(Venus conjunct the IC) with much music (Venus) in the home! Given
the position of Venus at the cusp of the fourth house, we might say
that this marriage was part of the soul's plan, and presented a much-needed
and balancing view on how a priest of God might live-more naturally.
Like St. Paul, Luther resolved his Scorpionic turmoil by finding a
loving God who bestowed upon sinful humans the free gift of salvation,
to be received through faith, against which all good works were as
nothing. Certainly this is a further corroboration of Luther's sixth
ray approach, emphasizing a God of Love, Who required of all human
beings faith-above all other contributing factors-if salvation were
to be attained.
It is interesting to realize that St. Paul as he approached the third
initiation immersed himself in the field of love (Letters to the Corinthians),
and Luther seemed to follow a similar course. Could it be that the
Leo ascending sign with its esoteric ruler, Neptune, (the planet of
the Christ, of buddhi and the heart) conferred this possibility?
Did Luther take the third initiation? Certainly he influenced directly
(and indirectly) millions of people for centuries to come. Scorpio
is a sign that may be associated with the first three initiations
(if not, in some important way, even the fourth). Leo is a sign that
may easily be associated with the third degree, as it represents the
Solar Angel risen to a position of domination over the personality
elementals which have been subdued by strenuous application of the
Scorpionic and Sagittarian forces. There is more than one way to achieve
the third degree, and Capricorn need not always be involved. However,
it must not be overlooked that while the preparation for Luther's
break with the Catholic Church occurred while his progressed Sun was
in the sign Sagittarius (a predominantly sixth ray sign having much
to do with the second initiation), when his ninety-five Theses were
actually posted on the door of the castle church, his progressed Sun
had moved into Capricorn (the sign of the third initiation).
We now come to the moment which destined Luther to break with the
Catholic Church and which, thus, set the Protestant Reformation upon
its inevitable course. The radix chart features involved show the
prominence of several signs and planets. Sagittarius is a sign in
which religion is emphasized, and Uranus, the Transformer, exalted
in Scorpio, is placed in Sagittarius. The Moon is a singleton on the
cusp of the ninth house of religion, and so, Luther being definitely
a disciple if not an initiate of some degree, must have had the Moon
veiling Uranus (further emphasizing this planet)-with Moon's position
trining the midpoint between the Mercury/Neptune conjunction and Uranus.
He initiated (Aries) great transformations (Moon veiling Uranus) in
the field of religion and religious philosophy (H9).
The ninety-five Theses were posted on All Saints Day, 1517. Initially,
Luther was largely protesting the dispensation of indulgences (a great
financial success for the Church) and was thus pitting himself against
the Church's commercial, venal third ray personality. The chain of
events which he launched (the triggering Moon in Aries), however,
went far beyond his original intentions and was responsible for creating,
at length, an entirely new religious and theological structure. It
is fascinating to see that at that crucial time, the progressed Sun,
which had entered Capricorn about a year and a half before, was receiving
a exact conjunction from transiting Pluto! A great destruction was
underway, leading to a re-birth of the Christian Church. Note as well,
that Pluto, the regenerator is a special ruler of Scorpio (one of
Luther's most significant signs) and is, natally, in close opposition
to that all important Aries Moon on the cusp of the ninth house. In
effect we have a natal Uranus/Pluto opposition, since the Moon in
advanced individuals veils Uranus. The potentials of this opposition
would be activated whenever Pluto came into prominence, as at the
time of the posting of the Theses.
Leo, his Ascendant, showed the strength with which he had to stand
for these Theses, and all the organized theology and doctrine which
developed from them. He had to embody the Reformation in his person
(Leo), and have the fortitude to withstand the inevitable backlash
from the Catholic orthodoxy of his day, as well as the splintering
effect of those within his own camp who wished to carry things perhaps
too far, and whose respect for the unity and synthesis which Leo represents
was far less than his own.
For the rest of his life, Luther was involved in a dangerous game-really
a kind of 'war' (Scorpio) with the Catholic Church, over the hearts
and minds of his countrymen. His life was frequently in danger. He
was eventually condemned as a heretic in 1521 (under the influence
of Uranus which was transiting in Taurus near his MC on the midpoint
between his MC/IC and his Scorpio Sun), and more than once he had
to flee opposing forces or be protected from them. On other occasions,
however, he marched directly into the "enemy camp" (the star Alhena),
and despite the patent danger, survived (the star Aculeus). The potential
courage of the combination of Leo and Scorpio are much in evidence.
Despite many setbacks (originating as much from his allies as his
enemies), he achieved great influence, and permanently weakened the
Catholic Church and its claims over the souls of humanity. In this
mission he attacked the misuse of the Catholic Church's first ray
soul energy, just as when he protested against its venality, he attacked
its third ray personality force.
In point of fact, Luther's influence extended far beyond Church matters.
He contributed to the formation of a new German nationalism which
was a seed of synthesis leading in later centuries to the formation
of true German nation. In Germany his socio-religious concepts laid
a new basis for German society, and His writings, in forceful idiomatic
language (an application of the first ray of which the Tibetan speaks),
helped fix the standards of modern German. Thus, it is clear that
his work had implications impacts not only in the Department of Religion
of the Bodhisattva, but also in the Departments of Civilization lead
by the Mahachohan and the Department of Government, led by the Manu.
It would seem that his greatest influence occurred in relation to
the Ashram of the Master Jesus, Whose work it is to oversee the development
of the Church and Christianity. However, it is also apparent that
Luther worked with the first ray, contributing the energy of synthesis,
becoming a factor of moment in the synthesizing of the German nation.
There is good reason to believe that St. Paul (Hilarion) for all his
recent emphasis upon the energy of Love and Buddhi, is a monad upon
the first ray. Again we ask, could the same be true of Martin Luther?
Martin Luther will always be considered the man who began the Protestant
Reformation. In this regard, it is important to consider a few of
the aspects of the stars relative to his natal chart. Both his Saturn
and Venus (planets of initiation) are closely conjunct Zuben Elschemali
(which are considered stars of "negative reform"). The term "negative"
should not be taken too literally, as it probably relates to the degree
of self-consultative independence with which the reformer undertakes
his mission, and the potentially drastic effect of the reform. Certainly,
Luther took matters into his own hands (Moon in Aries, Leo Ascendant),
and his reformation led, subsequently, to a number of brutal wars.
The star Alhena, called the "Proudly Marching One", is closely parallel
his MC, and its meaning is interpreted as "to have a mission"-an undeniable
truth in the case of Luther. One other star makes a close conjunction
to Uranus (the planet of reformation) in Sagittarius-Aculeus-the meaning
of which is "enduring attacks successfully"-also remarkably true of
Luther, who had to contend with conflict from the Catholic Church,
from the various factions within his own Reformation Movement, and
even from his own psyche-a battle of which every Scorpio person know.
Whatever may have been his personal limitations, Martin Luther stands
forth as a man of vision (Mercury and Neptune conjunct in visionary
Sagittarius with Uranus also in Sagittarius), and fortitude (four
planets in Scorpio with Leo Ascending and its ruler, the Sun, placed
in Scorpio). If the initiate can be recognized by his eventual positive
impact upon his society and humanity as a whole, Martin Luther has
to be recognized as an initiate.
Back
Nietzsche
Michael D. Robbins
1.
Friedrich Nietzsche-Philosopher: (1844-1890) October 15, 1844, Rocken,
Germany, 10:00 AM, LMT. (Source: Sabian Symbols), died August 25,
1900, Weimar, Germany.
(Ascendant the last degree of Scorpio; MC, Virgo with Mars in Virgo
conjunct the MC; Venus is also in Virgo, conjunct Chiron; Moon rising
in Sagittarius; Mercury in Libra widely conjunct Mars; Jupiter in
Pisces conjunct IC, widely conjunct Uranus in Aries; Saturn in Aquarius;
Neptune in Aquarius; Pluto in Aries exactly opposed the Sun)
It can be questioned, if the Ascending degree in Scorpio is so close
to Sagittarius (and the time of birth so apparently rounded off),
why might the Ascendant as well not be Sagittarius. In response to
this possibility, it would seem that the very evident Sagittarian
energies in Nietzsche's life are well covered by the afflicted Sagittarian
Moon.
Many other factors in his life, however, demand (if they are to be
understood) the potent presence of Scorpio and hence, the enhancement
of the power of Pluto. The birth could have been a little earlier
and only a mere three minutes later (before the change into Sagittarius),
but Scorpio as an Ascendant will have to be preserved if Nietzsche's
character and the deeper meaning of his life are to be revealed.
Friedrich Nietzsche was the most influential German Philosopher since
Kant and Hegel. He was , as well, a classical scholar, philosopher,
and critic of culture, who became one of the most brilliant (the stars
Arcturus and Spica conjunct the Sun) and influential of all modern
thinkers. His attempts to unmask the motives (the last and critical
degree of Scorpio Ascending) that underlie traditional Western religion,
morality, and philosophy deeply affected generations of theologians,
philosophers, psychologists, poets, novelists, and playwrights.
Nietzsche was not a systematic philosopher (third ray) but rather
a moralist (sixth ray) who passionately (sixth ray) rejected (first
ray) Western bourgeois civilization. He regarded Christian civilization
as decadent (Scorpionic sensitivity to morbidity), and in place of
its "slave morality" he looked to the superman, the creator of a new
heroic morality that would consciously affirm life (first ray) and
its highest values. That superman would represent the highest passion
(sixth ray) and creativity (fourth ray) and would live at a level
of experience beyond the conventional standards of good and evil.
His creative "will to power" (first ray) would set him off from "the
herd" of inferior humanity. A high note of idealism and perfectionism
rings through these thoughts, and a will to transcend the stultification
and corruption of normal life.
Nietzsche was a brilliant and respected philologist, and taught classes
in classical philology until 1879, but he longed for far greater expression.
Freeing himself from his onerous academic responsibilities, he spent
the next ten years in loneliness, writing his major works, including
Thus Spake Zarathustra, and Twilight of the Gods. He became insane
in 1889; probably due to the effects of latent syphilis, and spent
the next eleven years in complete mental darkness until he died on
August 25th, 1900.
According to the Tibetan, "the genius of Germany has often in the
past been expressed along the line of its fourth ray soul, and through
its power Germany has given much of music and philosophy to mankind."
(DN 58) Nietzsche's rays are not those usually found in the foremost
representatives of Western Philosophy (the third, fifth and second
rays).
The above quotation from The Destiny of the Nations makes it clear
that philosophy can also be found upon the fourth Ray of Harmony Through
Conflict, in which case it will not be especially systematic or cogently
logical, but, instead, will be rooted in dialectic and conflict and
will attempt to utilize the intuition to reconcile the warring opposites-or
it will emphasize, in an unbalanced manner, one pole over another.
Both such approaches were characteristic of Nietzsche's thought.
It is reasonable to think of Friedrich Nietzsche as possessed of a
fourth ray soul, a sixth ray personality, and a first ray mind (with
a strong and acute Libran Mercury {the hierarchical ruler of his Scorpio
Ascendant} conjunct a Virgoan Mars adding to the sharpness of his
mind), probably a sixth ray astral vehicle strongly influenced by
the fourth ray, and a rather seventh ray etheric/physical vehicle.
When looking for the conduits and reinforcements for some of these
important rays, we find the Scorpio Ascendant transmitting the fourth
ray, and the fourth ray Moon placed in Sagittarius, which sign is
also a partial conduit for the fourth ray. Mercury, a planet which
powerfully transmits the fourth ray is elevated in the tenth house,
and placed in Libra (a sign which, though not given as transmitting
the fourth ray, has many ambivalent characteristics suggestive of
the presence of this ray). In addition it is interesting to note that
the proposed ephemeris for the undiscovered planet, Pan-Loki, places
it in a close conjunction with the Moon. Pan is said to rule all manner
of divisions. Niklas Nihlen, in his book, The Unseen Planets describes
it in the following manner:
[Pan-Loki is active]-"Where there will be an identification of Cleavage,
and, therefore, an urge to be made whole by the higher synthesizing
aspect. The inter-relation of many energies, their fusion and their
balancing, plus the final synthesis of two major energies, their fusion
and their balancing" Pan-Loki, therefore, is clearly associated with
the fourth ray, and thus with all manner of cleavages, the pain of
those cleavages, and their reconciliation. Further channels for the
fourth ray in Nietzsche's birth chart are evident in abundance of
significant oppositions-an astrological aspect associated with the
contest between polarities and their possible reconciliation, fusing
and blending. Pluto opposes the Sun; Uranus opposes Mercury; Jupiter
opposes Mars.
Neptune, ruler of the fourth or buddhic plane should also be mentioned,
for it closely trines the Sun and is placed in the third house which
has so much to do with the mode in which mind perceives the world.
Neptune in the fourth house enhanced the possibility of buddhic perception
(when, in more ordinary cases, it does not simply lead to delusion).
Nietzsche's aesthetic sensitivity (associated with the fourth ray)
was furthered by this placement.
If, as hypothesized, the soul were upon the fourth ray, Mercury (the
main planetary conduit for the fourth ray) would become very important.
It is in the prominent tenth house and conjunct the other major ruler
of Scorpio, Mars. Nietzsche was known for his powerful (Mars/Mercury),
sensitive (Libra) and highly critical (Virgo) mind. By means of this
mind, he pursued his vocation (H10). Thus, the two rulers of Scorpio
(on three levels-exoteric, esoteric and hierarchical) are not only
conjuncted, and both of them conjunct the Virgo MC-Mercury through
the expediency of what is called "translation of light".
One might question, should the hierarchical ruler of the Ascendant
be utilized in this instance, but for the disciple/initiate it is,
in some cases, legitimate. Certainly , Nietzsche, for all his fourth
ray instability, was an advanced soul, commanding the respect of some
of the foremost thinkers of his age, and of decades to come. His Mercury
(already important as the exoteric ruler of his Virgo MC) would be
esoterically crucial in his chosen mission of seeing through cultural
illusions. In Scorpio it is said: "Let Maya flourish and deception
rule". The buddhic function of Mercury associated with Scorpio, dispels
illusion (Maya and deception), and would thus be crucially important
to the fulfillment of his deeper esoteric calling. That it was placed
in the sign Libra, gives it a potent evaluative function, providing
illumination through the faculty of comparison.
When considering reinforcements for Nietzsche's passionate sixth ray,
we look first to the Sagittarian Moon, and then to the two planets
placed in sixth ray Virgo (sixth ray Mars, and Venus-which, too, has
its sixth ray component), and thence to Jupiter (a planet with some
sixth ray vibrations) placed in Pisces-a sign which transmits both
the sixth and second ray as does Virgo. Thus all the signs connected
with the sixth ray (Virgo, Sagittarius and Pisces) hold important
planets . The Moon is the esoteric rulers of the MC, and, thus, a
veil for either Neptune or Uranus. In some ways it seems as if both
were active. The Moon's Neptune coloration would reinforce the sixth
ray Sagittarian potential, making of Nietzsche a philosophical (Sagittarius)
visionary (Neptune).
The Uranian coloring of the Moon, justifiable because Nietzsche was
an advanced soul, would add to his intellectual rebellion against
conventional culture and reinforce his iconoclasm. When considering
reinforcements for the first ray mind, we recognize that Mercury is
conjunct critical Mars in Virgo (a sign containing the potency of
first ray Vulcan). In addition, Mercury is ostensibly conjunct the
undiscovered planet Morya (a potently first ray planet relating to
being, Shamballa and the "Eye of God"). Further, Mercury receives
a very close opposition and parallel from Uranus (a planet conveying
the first ray from its monadic nature), and Uranus is placed in first
ray Aries. Saturn (with its confirmed first ray component) trines
Mercury from Aquarius.
As Nietzsche was certainly an initiate of some degree (probably the
second), the esoteric ruler of his Libran Sun sign, Uranus, must be
considered of importance. This potent Uranus, when related to his
powerful Mercury, reinforces his vocation of social revolutionary.
The normal ruler of the Sun sign is Venus (in Virgo), giving him an
exacting refinement of taste, and conferring, to some extent his musical
abilities-for he was both a composer of songs (in early days) and
an accomplished critic of fine music. Uranus, however contributed
to his role as arbiter of human values, based upon an entirely new
and revolutionary perspective. Though Libra is, archetypally the sign
of peace, how could peace prevail in the presence of such dynamic,
revolutionary and destructive aspects?
It was Nietzsche's role first to destroy, and then assert; many critics
do only the first. The destructiveness and potential regenerative
urge of his life is signaled by the powerful Scorpio Ascendant (in
Scorpio's last and critical degree), and by the special ruler of Scorpio,
Pluto in the first ray sign Aries, exactly (within a degree) opposed
the Libran Sun. Aries is the only first ray sign in which the major
planets are placed, but the two planets thus placed, Pluto and Uranus,
are very significant in the chart, for, as stated, Pluto rules Scorpio,
and Uranus (another partially first ray planet) is the esoteric ruler
of Libra, Nietzsche's Sun sign.
If we look at these two oppositions-Pluto opposed the Sun and Uranus
opposed Mercury, we can see Nietzsche's inherent attitude of rebellion.
He could not be satisfied with things as they were. He was the iconoclast;
the idols must be shattered, especially the "idols of the mind". The
fact that his Pisces IC is esoterically and hierarchically ruled by
Pluto, adds to his power to undermine the foundation (IC) of cultural
vision in decline, contributing to the psychological, philosophical
and theological, uncertainty, anxiety and moral relativism of the
modern age. This Pluto would have been active in Nietzsche's war against
religious and philosophical absolutes. If we look for the psychological
roots of this rebellious criticism of conventionality, we will notice
that Nietzsche's early home was a stronghold of Lutheran piety, and
that his upbringing was strictly Christian. The conventional and pious
side of the sign Virgo was at work. Further, Virgo rules "women" in
general and the "mother" in particular.
It so happens that Nietzsche, after the age of five and the death
of his father, was raised exclusively in the company of five women-his
mother, his sister, his maternal grandmother and two maiden aunts.
Hardly the atmosphere in which to cultivate thoughts of the "superman"
-except through compensation!
It should be noted that the planet of wounding, Chiron, is found in
Virgo, conjunct Venus (the planet, among other things, of the feminine)
again in Virgo-the sign of woman and the mother. The midpoint of these
two planets (Chiron and Venus) is square to the Moon (another 'planetary'
indicator of the feminine) showing the difficult relations with women
characteristic of Nietzsche's life, and perhaps indicating why he
should, through compensation, so much emphasize the strength of the
masculine polarity and all that was Dionysian and anti-Christian (Christianity
and its morality being easily interpreted as a 'soft' or feminine
religion). Perhaps second ray Jupiter in the compassionate sign Pisces,
conjunct the fourth house cusp of "home" indicates that Nietzsche
was protected and sheltered too much by the attentive feminine element
at home and longed to break free so that he could 'breathe'.
Nietzsche rebelled against the inherent asceticism of declining Christian
civilization. He railed against its implicit life-denial and nihilism.
In fact he was protesting against his puritanical, well-behaved upbringing.
His protest was passionate and unrelenting (sixth ray personality).
In fact he even managed to lose his mind to a sexually transmitted,
Scorpionic disease, syphilis. Nietzsche's mastery of classical philology
is reinforced by the trine between comparative Mercury in Libra and
exacting Saturn in fifth ray Aquarius. Further, his ascending degree
is Scorpio is placed within the Cancerian (or backward looking) decanate.
He had great respect for the glory of former civilizations and cultures
which compared unfavorably with the sterility of contemporary culture.
While Nietzsche may have begun his professional life as a philologist,
this discipline could not forever contain the wild, creative fervor
which seethed within his nature.
Breaking from this Saturnian, Mercurian discipline, he threw himself
into the world of aesthetics (fourth ray) with the writing of his
book The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music, in which he argued
that Greek tragedy arose out of the fusion of what he termed Apollonian
and Dionysian elements-the former representing measure, restraint,
harmony, and the latter representing unbridled passion-and that Socratic
rationalism and optimism spelled the death of Greek tragedy. We can
see him arguing here against rationalism (third and fifth rays), and
for the Dionysian element (fourth and sixth rays). The final sections
of this book extol Wagner and rhapsodize on the rebirth of tragedy
from the spirit of Wagner's music. In this literary effort we see
the blending of the aesthetic fourth ray and the passionate sixth.
Nietzsche's greatest literary contributions occurred during his years
of withdrawal (1879-1889). Constant serious ill health, semi-blindness
and pain (note the many squares and oppositions in his chart), and
his stultifying university work, forced him to withdraw from his teaching
responsibilities, and instead, concentrate upon writing. During this
time he published his philosophical and literary masterpiece, Thus
Spake Zarathustra, Beyond Good and Evil, and the Genealogy of Morals.
It is important to note that from 1879-1881 (depending upon the accuracy
of the 10:00 AM birth time), the progressed Sun had reached the last
degrees of Scorpio, was crossing his late Scorpio Ascendant, and was
moving into Sagittarius, during which time he offered the world his
most prophetic and philosophically powerful work (prophecy and philosophy
are both hallmarks of the Sagittarian energy).
The fact that the progressed Sun had come to the Ascendant and began
is progress through the first house, demonstrates an alignment between
the energy system of the personality, and the will, light and power
of the soul. Thus, these years were his most productive. As well,
during the early part of this period, transiting Pluto (the reformer
and regenerator--already opposing his Sun natally) was continuing
to move in opposition to his progressing Sun (as, amazingly, it had
since his birth) and was coming to a conjunction of the seventh house
cusp. His destructive, regenerative influence on society (H7) would
be at its greatest. We see that Nietzsche was, as it were, hunted
by Pluto, one of his major ruling planets, so that the urge to destroy
and resurrect never left him. He worked ever, its seems, under the
"Shadow of Death".
The year 1888 was Nietzsche's final lucid year and witnessed a great
outpouring (Jupiter) of his creative power. He wrote: The Case of
Wagner; The Twilight of the Idols; The Anti-Christ; Nietzsche Against
Wagner; and Ecce Homo. The main astrological correlation is transiting
Jupiter crossing the Ascendant, entering Sagittarius (its own sign)
and crossing the stellium of planets, asteroids and points to be found
in the first house of Nietzsche's chart-either natally or by progression.
These planets included his natal Moon, and progressed Sun and Mercury.
After this brilliant period, insanity, apparently caused by syphilis,
descended. The exact diagnosis was "atypical general paralysis caused
by dormant tertiary syphilis".
In January of 1889, Nietzsche collapsed in the streets of Turin. His
chart shows transiting Uranus conjunct his natal Sun in Libra and
opposing natal Pluto in Aries. Further, the Uranus transit was stationary
and thus more powerful. Neptune (paralysis and insanity) was transiting
conjunct his Descendent and in the same degree. During the next eleven
or so years Nietzsche lived in a vegetative state in complete mental
darkness, cared for variously by asylums, his mother and his sister.
Among the diseases to which the various ray types are prone, fourth
ray types can be the victims of insanities. (EH 51)
An analysis of Nietzsche's work shows it falling into three stages.
The first stage was characterized by a romantic perspective influenced
by Schopenhaur and Wagner. Chart reinforcements for this period consist
of the impulsive Sagittarian Moon widely trine natal Uranus in Aries,
and the close trine between romantic Neptune (in the third house of
mental perception) to the natal Libran Sun. This period saw the creation
of such works as The Birth of Tragedy and Untimely Meditations.
The second or middle period extols reason and science and reflects
Nietzsche's emancipation from Romanticism. His works such as Human,
All Too Human and The Gay Science are written somewhat in the style
of the French Aphorists. Astrological reinforcements for this period
emphasize Venus and Mars in Virgo and reasonable Mercury in a sign
of rational consideration, Libra.
In his mature writings, Nietzsche was fundamentally interested in
the origin and function of values. Here we see, especially, the importance
of his Libran Sun, ruled by Venus in Virgo (a position of refinement),
and his Mercury in Libra. Venus is the planet of values and Libra
is the sign of evaluation and assessment. That he was sharply critical
of the values of Western Civilization, may be laid to the power of
Mars, the exoteric and esoteric ruler of his Scorpio Ascendant, in
the critical sign Virgo, conjunct Mercury, the exoteric ruler of Virgo,
and in the very visible 10th house.
The destructive power of Pluto, the "destroyer", certainly adds to
the potency of his criticism. Nietzsche's greatest critiques were
leveled against asceticism and "slave morality". He had no use for
what we call the Christian virtues, and viewed them as a conspiracy
by the weak (the slaves) against those who were naturally and rightfully
powerful and masterful. In these thoughts we sense that Nietzsche
is encouraging the rebellion of man's instinctual, subterranean, Dionysian
forces against the unitive, solar forces. Scorpio and Pluto are asserting
themselves.
For Nietzsche, religious and philosophical absolutes (rooted in the
ascetic world view) had dissolved. Though his personal life (lived
strongly under the influence of Virgo, and much conditioned by the
piety of those who raise him), was ascetic and largely abstracted
from the expression of root instincts, in his writings he championed
the opposite-competition, pride and autonomy-the unleashing of the
natural strength of the individual, unfettered by the restrictions
of the "slave morality" of the weak. One does not have to think too
deeply to realize that Nietzsche was rebelling again the barely acknowledged
perception of his own weakness.
Nietzsche was the victim of a subtle existential despair and viewed
life as essentially and intrinsically meaningless-though not without
value. Ordinary human beings invested circumstance with meaning because
they (in their weakened moral and intellectual condition) could not
tolerate the truth of a fundamental meaninglessness. From these views
arose Nietzsche's famous (and much misunderstood) dictum, "God is
Dead". For Nietzsche, religious and philosophical absolutes were dead,
but there were truer values in need of passionate assertion.
Nietzsche attempted to replace nihilistic meaninglessness with several
key concepts: perspectivism, eternal recurrence, the will to power
and the superman.
Perspectivism is a concept which holds that knowledge is always
perspectival, that there are no immaculate perceptions, and that knowledge
from no point of view is as incoherent a notion as seeing from no
particular vantage point. One can relate this notion to two astrological
factors-Sun and Mercury in Libra (a sign which evaluates from a given
point of view), and the Sagittarian Moon, ever inclining towards the
attainment of a vision. These are two signs much associated with the
sense of perspective in both art and life. Libra (the sign of relationship)
is necessarily associated with relativism.
Things are evaluated depending upon one's vantage point. According
to perspectivism, there is no all-inclusive perspective, which could
contain all others and, hence, make reality available as it is in
itself. If there is no omnipresent point of view (such as 'God' has
been presumed to possess), the determination of reality becomes the
task of the perspectivally-limited individual-the tiny human being
asserting the value of his own perspectives. A great demand and burden
fall upon the human consciousness. It would appear that this philosophy
also grew out of a compensation for weakness, and a desire to prove
one's own potency, rather than attribute omnipotence, omniscience
and omnipresence to an absolute deity.
The concept of the "will to power" runs counter to the ascetic ideal
implicit in Western Civilization. This concept grows, to a degree,
out of the Nietzsche's first ray qualities, and is rooted especially
in the Pluto/Sun opposition.
Nietzsche believed, "all the supreme values of mankind lack this will-[and]
that values which are symptomatic of decline, nihilistic values, are
lording it under the holiest names." Here again, it would seem that
Nietzsche is doing battle with his own sense of personal impotence
(the vulnerability of the fourth and sixth rays). Nietzsche, who for
so many years of his life, was subject to physical and psychological
pain and suffering, repudiated the ascetic ideal of Western Civilization
which he believed endorses existence as pain and suffering. Nietzsche,
a man in whom the feminine virtues were pronounced (Libra planets
and its ruler, Venus in Virgo) longed for a life of greater authority,
dynamism and masculinity. Thus, he despised the apparent weakness
of the Christian World View which demands the suppression of individual
power and substitutes in its place, self-effacement for the sake of
love, unity and harmonious human relations.
The concept of "eternal recurrence" is a distortion of the "Law of
Periodicity" (an immeasurably more optimistic world view). The one
who accepts the perspective of eternal recurrence believes that there
will be, forever, an infinite repetition, without alteration, of each
and every moment one lives. This concept is more than depressing,
and Nietzsche on more than one occasion was nearly driven mad by its
contemplation. Eternal recurrence is the worst kind of fatalism. It
is born of a deep feeling of helplessness rooted in rigid determinism.
Presumably, even one's best and most heroic present efforts are but
exact repetitions of and infinitude of identical efforts which have
preceded them and which will follow. This is a philosophy of despair
and impotence, and it is difficult to understand how it could have
lodged so fixedly in Nietzsche's psyche-except that he loved tragedy.
The lot of mankind under the doctrine of eternal recurrence was certainly,
for the vast majority (including Nietzsche) tragic. According to Nietzsche,
the only kind person who would be strong enough to accept recurrence
without self-deception or evasion would be a superhuman being (Übermensch),
a superman, whose distance from the ordinary man is greater than the
distance between man and ape.
Nietzsche was a brilliant, aesthetically gifted philosopher and acutely
sensitive human being-whose life was a torture (fourth ray and sixth
ray), both psychologically and physically. For students of the Ageless
Wisdom, accustomed to considering discipleship and the life of the
initiate in terms of the behavior common to certain rays (the first
and second for instance), it may be difficult to recognize an advanced
soul upon the fourth ray. The familiar characteristics may not present
themselves, and much of negativity may obscure the soul qualities
being expressed.
What could the soul be seeking to express in such a brilliant, posthumously
influential and tortured life? Nietzsche was a great evaluator and
critic of the illusions in which human society is immersed. Speaking
in terms of the Ageless Wisdom, he longed for buddhic life beyond
mind, for a life of potent and sublime experiences, untrammeled by
the strictures imposed by pettiness and small-mindedness. He longed
for some transcendent harmony beyond the sordidness and stupidity
of the conventional life which confronted him. Thus, it was his task
to evaluate, critique and pierce through the many illusions which
prevented this higher, greater life, and then to destroy those illusions.
Here we see the full spiritual power of the late Scorpio Ascendant
and (ever-present) Pluto.
On some deep level, Nietzsche was an advocate of the life aspect-the
first aspect of divinity, and its expression. Certainly he displayed
the first ray (through aspects of his mind and, to an extent, through
his isolative personality), but it would be hard to conceive of him
as a first ray soul. What the quality of the monadic ray may be is
difficult to determine, but the "will to power" (expressing itself
through a sensitive energy system wracked with conflict) has to originate
somewhere. One might suggest this "will to power" was only compensation
for real and perceived personal insufficiencies-for severely curtained
physical and emotional expression. Indeed, in Nietzsche's life there
were many compensations. but the power and beauty of Nietzsche's writings
(he was considered one of the great masters of German prose) might
have a still deeper source. Perhaps it was his great frustration to
be in touch with that tremendous, liberating spirit-potency and yet
be unable to actualized it through his rather delicate personality
instrument.
It might be said of Friedrich Nietzsche that he was born posthumously.
He, himself, said that this was the fate of some important individuals.
Great recognition came to him after his death, and he influenced a
wide range of distinguished thinkers-philosophers, psychologists and
theologians-all deeply indebted to his thought. Perhaps, after all,
he was a true humanist (like so many notable German thinkers, a fourth
ray soul). Perhaps his task was to remove an oppressive cultural emphasis
upon "God-transcendent" and restore man's faith in "God-immanent"-the
power of the divine within, and thus man's faith in himself.
It seems Nietzsche was a visionary, striving towards a state of consciousness
which he was never entirely able to achieve. In this respect, it could
be said that he failed in personal application. This failure may mean
that he did not achieve the relative stability, illumination and deeply-seated
joy characteristic of the third degree, but one must be careful not
to judge too hastily the quality of the unrevealed interior states
of exalted thinkers. Whatever may have been his initiatory status,
his profound influence upon twentieth century thought (both for good
and for ill) mark him out as a remarkable (if volatile) disciple,
pointing the way to what he and others must one day become-real "supermen".
Do the Masters of the Wisdom demand of us any less?
Back
|